After elementary school, I went to a middle school with kids from many different educational backgrounds. I quickly discovered that I was less prepared for the work than many of them. Another student could study for an hour and get an A on a test, while I had to study all night to get that same A. It didn’t seem fair. That’s why I think grades should be replaced by a more comprehensive evaluation of the student as a whole. A single letter can’t convey enough information about how hard a student worked or what their true strengths are.
Grades are useful only for calculating a student’s grade point average, or GPA. If a student is passionate about science and excels at math but isn’t good at art, their GPA might be a 3.0, while a student who has little passion for anything might get the same GPA. How can you tell, looking at that number, which student is more invested in their education? How can you tell which student has the greater capacity to make an impact on the world? A more equitable system would be pass/fail combined with written evaluations that take into account each student’s circumstances and reward effort as much as achievement.
Supporters of the grading system say that grades inspire you to do your best. But grades make students work for a reward, rather than the satisfaction of mastering the material. This system might motivate high-performing students who can earn all A’s, but it can have the opposite effect on students who aren’t as strong academically. In fact, grades can be demotivating: According to a study published in the journal Assessment in Education, students who struggled in school in seventh through ninth grades and received poor grades were less likely to graduate from high school than students who struggled but didn’t receive letter grades.
Finally, I believe grades impede students’ curiosity to try out new subjects without the fear of negatively affecting their GPA. Students shouldn’t be defined by a letter or number grade during their adolescent years, and a pass/fail system, combined with comprehensive evaluations, is the answer.